​

Would expand Arizona's existing constitutional restrictions on racial preferences, including limits involving diversity or equity statements, publicly funded education positions, disciplinary policies, and some questions about race or experiences with racial issues. The report card concludes the measure could suppress legitimate teaching, hiring, research, outreach, and discussion concerning discrimination.

Would restrict certain municipal grocery-tax changes, require voter approval for future new or increased grocery taxes, and cap newly adopted or increased rates at 2%. The report card supports the measure with reservations because grocery taxes are regressive while many rural municipalities rely on the revenue.

Would expand restrictions on transgender participation in school athletics, apply restrictions to private schools and athletic associations, define sex using an original birth certificate, restrict facility use consistent with gender identity, and authorize lawsuits. The report card concludes the measure goes substantially beyond competitive-sports rules.

Would constitutionally prohibit taxes or fees based on vehicle miles traveled and restrict government monitoring or limiting of vehicle mileage without owner consent, with certain exceptions. The report card recognizes privacy as a legitimate concern but opposes permanently eliminating a possible future transportation-funding method.

Would require government-issued identification for every voter, including mail voters, while leaving the Legislature to determine how mail voters provide that identification. It also contains provisions concerning Election Day tabulation, foreign-national election spending, citizenship, court challenges, and implementation funding.

Would declare drug cartels terrorist organizations, direct the Arizona Department of Homeland Security to act within its authority against cartel threats, broadly define cartels, and address asylum claims. The report card finds the measure vague, potentially prone to politicized immigration enforcement and civil-rights abuses, and largely symbolic.

Would generally prohibit new state or local photo-enforcement systems after December 31, 2026, while allowing existing systems to continue with periodic voter approval. The report card identifies legitimate due-process, privacy, and accountability arguments alongside concerns about limiting local public-safety decisions.